olof65 Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 hittade detta på en sida idag: My Hardware 2.0 mailbag is brimming with Windows 7 related questions. The main question on everyones lips is the obvious one - How does Windows 7 stack up against Vista? Important note: Before I go any further I feel I need to make a point, and make it clear. The build Im testing of Windows 7 (build 6956) is a pre-beta build, and as a rule pre-beta builds arent known for their performance. That said, the performance of this build should give us a clue as to how the OS is coming along. This test will pitch Windows 7 build 6956 32-bit against Windows Vista RTM 32-bit and Windows Vista SP1 32-bit. Check out the Windows 7 build 6956 benchmark gallery UPDATE: Ive added Windows XP data to the data below. Check out this post for details. The System Heres the spec of the system I used: Phenom 9700 quad-core processor ATI Radeon 3850 graphics card with 256MB RAM ASUS M3A32-MVP Deluxe motherboard 2GB (2 x 1GB) Corsair Dominator CM2X1024-8500C5D RAM Western Digital Raptor 10,000RPM 150GB primary hard drive Western Digital Caviar 7,200RPM 500GB secondary hard drive Each system was fully patched with all patches available from Windows Update. Other noteworthy points: No optimizations were carried out other than to process idle tasks and defrag the hard drive between each test. Windows Defender was left on for all tests. The Microsoft Windows Vista SP1 testing guidelines document was followed closely. The Tests For this test were going to use one real life test and three synthetic benchmarks: Boot-up time PassMark PerformanceTest PCMark Vantage CINEBENCH R10 This is a simple test which involves measuring the time it takes to go from the boot loader to a usable desktop. Windows 7 build 6956 Boot up time: 20 sec Vista 32-bit RTM Boot up time: 27 sec Vista 32-bit SP1 Boot up time: 31 sec Note: Lower score is better. Advantage: Windows 7 PassMark PerformanceTest PassMark PerformanceTest 6 is a comprehensive benchmarking app that examines several key aspects of the system: CPU tests Mathematical operations, compression, encryption, SSE, 3DNow! instructions and more 2D graphics tests Drawing lines, bitmaps, fonts, text, and GUI elements 3D graphics tests Simple to complex DirectX 3D graphics and animations Disk tests Reading, writing and seeking within disk files Memory tests Allocating and accessing memory speed and efficiency CD / DVD test Test the speed of your CD or DVD drive Here are the results: Windows 7 build 6956 Score: 1007.5 Vista 32-bit RTM Score: 1001.3 Vista 32-bit SP1 Score: 986.6 Note: Higher score is better. Advantage: Windows 7 Next we move onto PCMark Vantage. A PCMark score is a measure of your computers performance across a variety of common tasks such as viewing and editing photos, video, music and other media, gaming, communications, productivity and security. Windows 7 build 6956 Score: 5233 Vista 32-bit RTM Score: 4807 Vista 32-bit SP1 Score: 4762 Note: Higher score is better. Advantage: Windows 7 CINEBENCH R10 Next, CINEBENCH. CINEBENCH is a real-world test suite based on MAXONs award-winning animation software, CINEMA 4D, which is used extensively by studios and production houses worldwide for 3D content creation. Windows 7 build 6956 1CPU Score: 2076 xCPU Score: 7370 Multi-proc speedup: 3.55x OpenGL: 3183 Vista 32-bit RTM 1CPU Score: 2172 xCPU Score: 7808 Multi-proc speedup: 3.59x OpenGL: 3960 Vista 32-bit SP1 1CPU Score: 2084 xCPU Score: 7140 Multi-proc speedup: 3.43x OpenGL: 3458 Note: Higher score is better. Advantage: Windows Vista 32-bit RTM Conclusion What we have here is one set of data points for one particular system, but I think that the results are very promising. The fact that Windows 7 comes out top in three out of four of these tests at this early stage is very promising indeed. The boot time and PCMark Vantage results are particularly good. I remember benchmarking an early pre-beta of Vista and it was awful compared to XP at the time. At this stage I can only assume that the RTM release of Windows 7 will offer more performance than this build, and will at the RTM stage be better than Vista. This is great for those who are concerned about the OS soaking up too much system resources. Source:ZDNet Hardware 2.0 Blog länk med bilder http://www.vista123.net/content/windows-7-...erformance-test vet inte någon har postat detta iaf men gör det då. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manneman Posted December 12, 2008 Share Posted December 12, 2008 Härligt att läsa... stärker känslan att man gjorde rätt i att installera det. Efter några dagar är jag inne på Stenis linje: Windows 7 stannar i denna datorn permanent. Mange Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreas Stenhall Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 Ja, efter att ha kört 6956 i ett par dagar nu så måste jag säga att den är betydligt vassare än pre-betan 6801. Jag själv kommer dock inte att göra några prestandamätningar förrän betan eller RC:n släpps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
munketh Posted December 13, 2008 Share Posted December 13, 2008 Har 6956 i en plus lap kör bara dom. När jag använder datorn med Vista som jag har som server tror man att nätverkssladden inte är inkopplad sen kommer nätverket upp.6956 mycket snabb med fjärrskrivbord. Verkar väldigt lovande med tanke på att det bara är en prebeta. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.